| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 11 post(s) |
Azami Nevinyrall
Carbon Circle
Tactical Narcotics Team
740
   |
Posted - 2013.03.18 15:47:00 -
[1] - Quote
Now, about those pesky and obvious bots in Jita...
I'm not entirely clear on the point of this, but I do have a sudden urge to jump in a catalyst and blow up a miner.
Twitter! - @AzamiNevinyrall
I'm half expecting a ban for this post. |
Azami Nevinyrall
Carbon Circle
Tactical Narcotics Team
740
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 17:48:00 -
[2] - Quote
Lapine Davion wrote:o7 Sreegs. Goonswarm will be glad to have their Darius JOHNSON back.
He left?
I'm not entirely clear on the point of this, but I do have a sudden urge to jump in a catalyst and blow up a miner.
Twitter! - @AzamiNevinyrall
I'm half expecting a ban for this post. |
Azami Nevinyrall
Carbon Circle
Tactical Narcotics Team
740
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 17:59:00 -
[3] - Quote
CCP Stillman wrote:Vera Algaert wrote:CCP Stillman wrote:Vera Algaert wrote:CCP Stillman wrote:
But client modification right now are anything that injects/touches the running EVE process. That is, reads or writes memory into it, injects and executes code. Basically anything that modifies the client to change the client or extract information that's not normally accessible. That includes bots of course.
that description also applies to widely used tool such as the Mumble/Teamspeak overlay and fraps  To some degree, it does. But in some ways, it also doesn't. But do you really think we want to ban people using fraps or mumble/teamspeak? That'd be silly I don't know... after all you're not going to whitelist specific programs  (with 100% less tongue-in-cheekness: I am a bit afraid that one day you will introduce a poorly tested client integrity check that accidentally flags tools such as the ones I mentioned and that getting the permabans undone will be a massive hassle.) I understand your concern. We'll address that concern in more detail in the possibly near future when it's relevant :)
*uninstalls fraps, good thing I auto disable overlay*
What are you doing about the Jita bots?
I'm not entirely clear on the point of this, but I do have a sudden urge to jump in a catalyst and blow up a miner.
Twitter! - @AzamiNevinyrall
I'm half expecting a ban for this post. |
Azami Nevinyrall
Carbon Circle
Tactical Narcotics Team
742
|
Posted - 2013.03.19 13:40:00 -
[4] - Quote
Olaf4862 wrote:Just a thought but banning just the account for 30 days is not going to hurt a botter with multiple accounts. Might I suggest a ban on the IP used also for 24 hrs to make the point clear that botting is not acceptable. This will do more then just effect their botted account but any other account coming from that IP. Yes I understand that it might adversely effect players in the same household who are not botting but an IP block might help to put on the added per pressure that its not OK to bot. 
It only takes a 5 min phone call to you ISP, just to ask for a new IP Addy. Thus, making your point moot...
I'm not entirely clear on the point of this, but I do have a sudden urge to jump in a catalyst and blow up a miner.
Twitter! - @AzamiNevinyrall
I'm half expecting a ban for this post. |
Azami Nevinyrall
Carbon Circle
Tactical Narcotics Team
742
|
Posted - 2013.03.19 13:45:00 -
[5] - Quote
Tarpedo wrote:Something in Jita local says (at least to me) anti-botting team isn't too efficient.
You should speak to Chribba, he's been saying that for..........a long time now!
If him along with his insane database can't get CCP to notice the Jita-bot problem' then, nothing really can. They know it's there, they're either just ignorant to the fact or planning something in the near future. But, no dev has given any thought on that problem....that I'm aware of.
I'm not entirely clear on the point of this, but I do have a sudden urge to jump in a catalyst and blow up a miner.
Twitter! - @AzamiNevinyrall
I'm half expecting a ban for this post. |
| |
|